GitHub LinkedIn RSS
Showing posts with label DevOps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DevOps. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 28, 2014

AngularJS E2E Testing with Protractor


In continuation to AngularJS series, today we'll discuss e2e or end-to-end testing of AngularJS applications. If you've been following the blog for a while, you must have noticed my numerous stressing the importance of unit testing using Jasmine and Karma and automating JavaScript testing with Grunt.js. The only thing left behind was e2e testing, of which we would talk today using Protractor for AngularJS applications.

What is E2E Testing?


End-to-end testing is a methodology used to test, whether the flow of an application is performing as designed from start to finish. The purpose of carrying out end-to-end tests is to identify system dependencies and to ensure that the right information is passed between various system components and systems.

In contrast to unit testing, which verifies the correct behaviour of various components separately, end-to-end testing verifies the entire flow of the application. From front end development perspective, it will be checking, whether JavaScript logic is reflected in the UI components. Good thing about Protractor is that we can write our end-to-end specs using Jasmine, so no knowledge of additional framework is needed.

angular-seed


To demonstrate the methodology, I'll be using angular-seed project, actually the whole article will be based on this repository. This project is an application skeleton for a typical AngularJS web app. You can use it to quickly bootstrap your angular webapp projects and dev environment for these projects. Installing the application is no-brainer, just follow the instructions in the repository - they are quite detailed. The reason I've chosen the seed project, was it had already had preconfigured Jasmine unit tests and e2e protractor tests in place. What is left is to understand the code :)

Unit testing with Karma


End-to-end testing doesn't replace the good old unit testing. It merely completes it to provide a comprehensive testing tookit. Let's take a look at Karma configuration file, karma.conf.js:
module.exports = function(config){
  config.set({

    basePath : './',

    files : [
      'app/bower_components/angular/angular.js',
      'app/bower_components/angular-route/angular-route.js',
      'app/bower_components/angular-mocks/angular-mocks.js',
      'app/components/**/*.js',
      'app/view*/**/*.js'
    ],

    autoWatch : true,

    frameworks: ['jasmine'],

    browsers : ['Chrome'],

    plugins : [
            'karma-chrome-launcher',
            'karma-firefox-launcher',
            'karma-jasmine',
            'karma-junit-reporter'
            ],

    junitReporter : {
      outputFile: 'test_out/unit.xml',
      suite: 'unit'
    }

  });
};
There are two interesting things about it. One is the integration with JUnit reporter, which reports test results in JUnit xml format. It than can be parsed programmatically and used for various DevOps purposes. For it however to work, you'll have to add the following line, indicating the usage of the reporter:
reporters: ['progress', 'junit']
The second thing is including angular-mocks.js file. It contains supporting functions for testing AngularJS application. Let's take a look at spec defined in version_test.js and see them in action.
'use strict';

describe('myApp.version module', function() {
  beforeEach(module('myApp.version'));

  describe('version service', function() {
    it('should return current version', inject(function(version) {
      expect(version).toEqual('0.1');
    }));
  });
});
We can see here the usage of functions module and inject. Both work in pair. The former registers a module configuration code by collecting the configuration information, which will be used when the injector is created by inject function. The latter wraps a function into an injectable function. The inject() creates new instance of $injector per test, which is then used for resolving references. You can read more about these functions in the respective documentation pages. You can also read a great article about Angular and Jamine here. The unit tests are run, as usual, using Karma command:
karma start karma.conf.js

End-to-end testing with Protractor


Protractor is a Node.js program built on top of WebDriverJS, which is Node.js runner, similar to node-jasmine, of which we've talked in Jasmine and Node.js article. Installing the driver is easy using the npm:
npm install -g selenium-webdriver
Then we need to set-up the selenium environment by running the following command:
npm run webdriver-manager
The interesting thing about this command is that it is run through the npm. The executed commands can be found in package.json file under scripts section.
"scripts": {
    "postinstall": "bower install",

    "prestart": "npm install",
    "start": "http-server -a localhost -p 8000 -c-1",

    "pretest": "npm install",
    "test": "karma start karma.conf.js",
    "test-single-run": "karma start karma.conf.js  --single-run",

    "preupdate-webdriver": "npm install",
    "update-webdriver": "webdriver-manager update",

    "preprotractor": "npm run update-webdriver",
    "protractor": "protractor e2e-tests/protractor.conf.js"
  }
So executing the webdriver-manager command, will actually execute webdriver-manager update. However since we have a pre prefix followed by the same name on another section, preupdate-webdriver, this script will be executed first - npm install. As you see configuring scripts through package file, allows us a lot of flexibility ensuring everything is run in the desired order.

Once everything is in place, let's start our e2e testing by typing the following command:
npm run protractor
Anddddd, it doesn't work - of course it won't :) So what is the problem:
....
protractor e2e-tests/protractor.conf.js

Starting selenium standalone server...
Selenium standalone server started at http://10.0.0.5:36333/wd/hub

/home/victor/git/angular-seed/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/selenium-
webdriver/lib/webdriver/promise.js:1640
      var result = fn();
                   ^
Error: Angular could not be found on the page http://localhost:8000/app/index.html :
retries looking for angular exceeded
From looking at the log we see that the webdriver is up and running on port 36333 and Protractor tries to fetch the page from port 8000. Is this the problem? As we can see Protractor runs according to configuration file e2e-tests/protractor.conf.js. Let's have a look at it:
exports.config = {
  allScriptsTimeout: 11000,

  specs: [
    '*.js'
  ],

  capabilities: {
    'browserName': 'chrome'
  },

  baseUrl: 'http://localhost:8000/app/',

  framework: 'jasmine',

  jasmineNodeOpts: {
    defaultTimeoutInterval: 30000
  }
};
Very similar to Karma config, isn't it? Run the specs written in Jasmine using Chrome on localhost:8000. But what is 8000? If we put here the port of our WebDriver, 36333, it won't help either, since WebDriver runs the Protractor tests and not the page itself. So the solution is pretty straight forward - configure web server on port 8000 to serve our app. Any server. Apache, Jetty or IIS God forbid, what ever is close to your heart. Rerunning the previous command will result some flickering on the page and console will report the passed tests. The tests are configured in scenarios.js file. I'll show you just one of them:
describe('view1', function() {

  beforeEach(function() {
    browser.get('index.html#/view1');
  });


  it('should render view1 when user navigates to /view1',
    function() {
    expect(element.all(by.css('[ng-view] p')).first()
      .getText()).toMatch(/partial for view 1/);
  });
})
Pay attention that instead of testing the internal logic of application, it rather tests the end result displayed to the user. That is, take the text of item retrieved by css rule, [ng-view] p, and test if it matches the string partial for view 1. That why it's called e2e testing.

Hope you found this article useful and would try to Protractor in your own projects. Next time we'll discuss Protractor usage with non AngularJS sites and also compare it to additional utility called CasperJS.
Sunday, September 7, 2014

JavaScript Continuous Integration with TravisCI


Last time we talked about automating JavaScript testing with Grunt.js, and even though we quite exhausted the topic, there is one thing left. The provided solution worked well for a solo developer or maybe a small team, however imagine you work with dozen developers, where everyone pushes one's commits constantly. Forcing all of them to follow a procedure of running automated script upon each commit, will be no trifle. Continuous integration comes to rescue. What it does is running predefined build scripts, in our case Grunt.js, on each predefined event - usually on each push.

TravisCI


As usual, we'll start a new topic with the easiest implementation to get you started with the technology. Once you master the basics, we'll continue with more advanced tools in the next article. Today we'll talk about TravisCI and create continuous integration for our last article code and only focus on needed changes. I've copied the code into new Git repository.

TravisCI integrates seamlessly with public and private GitHub repositories. Public ones are free of charge. To get you started, go to TravisCI site, connect with GitHub account and enable the toggle next your repository - that's it! Then we need to configure our repository to play together with the integration server.

Karma and TravisCI


TravisCI only supports Firefox based UI testing, so in order make things work, we need to align both karma.conf.js and karma.conf.require.js Karma configs using process.env.TRAVIS parameter, which notifies us whether we run the tests on Travis machine or not. We'll test our code on Chrome in development environment and on Firefox on integration one
browsers: process.env.TRAVIS ? ['Firefox'] : ['Chrome']
Since there is no actual screen to display the UI, Xvfb is used instead. However you'll need to tell your testing tool process about the display port, so it knows where to start Firefox. All this along with other configurations is stated in .travis.yml file. Before our testing scripts are run, we set the display to 99th configured screen and start xvfb process.
before_script:
  - export DISPLAY=:99.0
  - sh -e /etc/init.d/xvfb start

TravisCI configuration


Let's look into our .travis.yml configuration file line by line:
language: node_js
node_js:
  - 0.10

before_script:
  - export DISPLAY=:99.0
  - sh -e /etc/init.d/xvfb start
  - npm install
  - npm install -g bower
  - bower install

script:
  - grunt
TravisCI supports many languages, we of course interested in Node.js, which is configured in first line. Following the language declaration, we configure the versions of our distribution in lines 2 and 3. Later we define everything, that needs to be done prior to running the scripts.

Since each time we run the integration process on a blank machine, we should install all the packages listed in our package.json and bower.json files. To do so we first run the npm install command and after that both install bower globally and run the bower install directive. Lastly we specify the script command needed to be run, in our case simply grunt, as we want to run all the tasks defined in gruntfile.js file.

Package integration


Lastly, we need to add command name needed for running the tests in package.json.
"scripts": {
    "test": "grunt"
  }

Build status image


Once everything is configured, wouldn't it be cool to show the build status somewhere on team's dashboard or repository readme file. TravisCI provides a simple image, visualizing the status of last build. Just enter repository configuration page and click on the image to the right. Popup will be opened with image URL:
https://travis-ci.org/aie0/jsdeepdive-javascript-continuous-integration-with-
travisci.svg?branch=master
Putting it in readme is one step task, just copy-paste the following line, substituting TRAVISCI_STATUS_IMAGE_URL with status image and TRAVISCI_REPOSITORY_PAGE with TravisCI repository page.
[![Build Status](TRAVISCI_STATUS_IMAGE_URL)](TRAVISCI_REPOSITORY_PAGE)
In our case:
[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/aie0/jsdeepdive-javascript-continuous-
integration-with-travisci.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/aie0/jsdeepdive-
javascript-continuous-integration-with-travisci)
Hope you enjoyed the article, cause next time we'll be talking about JenkinsCI, which can be configured with any repository.
Sunday, August 31, 2014

Automate JavaScript Testing with Grunt.js


So far we've learned how to test your JavaScript code with Jasmine and running them against Node.js and browsers with Karma. We've also got familiar with modular design patterns in JavaScript. And yet, somehow it seems that we're still missing one last puzzle piece connecting all the others, it's called Grunt.js.

What is it?


According to it's site:
In one word: automation. The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
Zero or not, there is a bit of effort in making everything play together, but no worry - we'll figure it out. So what's our plan?
  • Write classes, which are both usable in Node.js, Require.js and global environment.
  • Write Jasmine specs to test our code in both Chrome and Firefox
  • Write Karma and Node.js runners
  • Write Grunt task to automate the testing

Writing universal JavaScript classes


In the end we'll type one command to test our code from every aspect. Feeling excited? Let's start! All the code can be found in GitHub, to where I copied some code from my project called Raceme.js, JavaScript clustering algorithms framework (some harmless PR :) First one is Vector class, which wraps the JavaScript array with minor functionality:
(function () {
    'use strict';

    var Vector = function Vector(v) {
        var vector = v;

        this.length = function length() {
            return vector.length;
        };

        this.toArray = function toArray() {
            return vector;
        };
    };

    if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
        // Publish as AMD module
        define(function() {return Vector;});
    } else if (typeof(module) !== 'undefined' && module.exports) {
        // Publish as node.js module
        module.exports = Vector;
    } else {
        // Publish as global (in browsers)
        var Raceme = window.Raceme = window.Raceme || {};
        Raceme.Common = Raceme.Common || {};
        Raceme.Common.Vector = Vector;
    }
}());
Notice the lower part of the code, where we define our class as AMD module using Require.js, CommonJS module for Node.js and global class for window environment. To spice things up, we'll add additional class, PlaneMapper, which will depend on our Vector class. It exposes one method, mapVector, mapping 2-dimensional coordinate point into vector. The problem with writing dependent universal classes is the loading process. As you remember, Require.js and Node.js use different loading methods - asynchronous versus synchronous. loadDependencies method unifies the approaches into one loading process. Pay attention to continuation of declaration logic in line 29; Once we have our PlaneMapper object defined, we finalize the declaration depending upon the method.
(function () {
    'use strict';

    var COMMONJS_TYPE = 2, GLOBAL_TYPE = 3;
    var loadDependencies = function loadDependencies(callback) {
        if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
            // define AMD module with dependencies
            define(['common/Vector'], callback); // cannot pass env type
        } else if (typeof(module) !== 'undefined' && module.exports) {
            // load CommonJS module
            callback(require('../common/Vector.js'), COMMONJS_TYPE);
        } else {
            // Publish as global (in browsers)
            callback(Raceme.Common.Vector, GLOBAL_TYPE);
        }
    };
    loadDependencies(function (Vector, env) {
        var PlaneMapper = function () {
            var mapVector = function mapVector(node) {
                return new Vector([node.x, node.y]);
            };

            return {
                mapVector: mapVector
            };
        };

        // finalize the declaration
        switch(env) {
            case COMMONJS_TYPE:
                module.exports = PlaneMapper();
                break;
            case GLOBAL_TYPE:
                var Raceme = window.Raceme = window.Raceme || {};
                Raceme.DataMappers = Raceme.DataMappers || {};
                Raceme.DataMappers.PlaneMapper = PlaneMapper();
                break;
            default:
                return PlaneMapper();
        }
    });
}());

Writing universal Jasmine specs


Code is written, time for testing. We'll create two Jasmine specs, each for one of the classes. As in before, we start with Vector class:
(function () {
    'use strict';
    describe('Mappers', function () {
        var loadDependencies = function loadDependencies(callback) {
            if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
                // load AMD module
                define(['common/Vector'], callback);
            } else if (typeof(module) !== 'undefined' && module.exports) {
                // load CommonJS module
                callback(require('../../src/common/Vector.js'));
            } else {
                // Publish as global (in browsers)
                callback(Raceme.Common.Vector);
            }
        };
        loadDependencies(function (Vector) {
            var vector;
            describe('Vector', function () {
                beforeEach(function() {
                    vector = new Vector([1, 2, 3]);
                });
                it('check length', function () {
                    expect(vector.length()).toEqual(3);
                });

                it('check toArray', function () {
                    expect(vector.toArray()).toEqual([1, 2, 3]);
                });
            });
        });
    });
})();
Nothing new here - we load the Vector class prior to declaring the spec using the same technique. Same with our mapper, besides loading two classes.
(function () {
    'use strict';
    describe('Mappers', function () {
        var loadDependencies = function loadDependencies(callback) {
            if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
                // load AMD module
                define(['common/Vector', 'dataMappers/PlaneMapper'], callback);
            } else if (typeof(module) !== 'undefined' && module.exports) {
                // load CommonJS module
                callback(require('../../src/common/Vector.js'), 
                    require('../../src/dataMappers/PlaneMapper.js'));
            } else {
                // Publish as global (in browsers)
                callback(Raceme.Common.Vector, Raceme.DataMappers.PlaneMapper);
            }
        };
        loadDependencies(function (Vector, PlaneMapper) {
            var vector;
            describe('PlaneMapper', function () {
                var mapper, node;
                beforeEach(function() {
                    mapper = PlaneMapper;
                    node = {
                        x: 5,
                        y: 10
                    };
                });
                it('check mapping', function () {
                    vector = mapper.mapVector(node);
                    expect(vector.toArray()).toEqual([5, 10]);
                });
            });
        });
    });
})();

Configuring Jasmine spec runners


Testing Node.js modules is easy - just run the jasmine-node command with path to the specs.
jasmine-node test/spec
Moving on to browser testing. We'll start with easier case using global declarations. First we create Karma configuration file, karma.conf.js. The main interest is in files and browsers sections, where we define our source and spec files in correct order and browsers we want to test.
...
files: [      
  'src/common/*.js',
  'src/dataMappers/*.js',
  'test/spec/*Spec.js'
],
...
browsers: ['Chrome', 'Firefox'],
...
Then invoking the tests using karma command.
karma start karma.conf.js
Lastly, let's test our Require.js modules. Since the modules will by loaded by Require.js instead of Karma, a new Karma configuration file is required - karma.conf.require.js. The first difference appears in frameworks section, where we tell Karma to use Require.js framework. This will require installing additional package called karma-requirejs.
...
frameworks: ['jasmine', 'requirejs'],
...
files: [
    {pattern: 'src/common/*.js', included: false},
    {pattern: 'src/dataMappers/*.js', included: false},
    {pattern: 'test/spec/*Spec.js', included: false},
    'test/test-require-main.js'
],
...
Additional difference comes in files section. Here we inform the test runner not to load our source and spec files. So why to list them at all? Listing the files enables us to use them later, during configuration of Require.js in test-require-main.js. Usually Require.js configuration appears in JavaScript file, mentioned in data-main attribute of script tag. However since we don't want to load HTML files, we configure our modules in test-require-main.js.
(function () {
    'use strict';
    var tests = [];
    for (var file in window.__karma__.files) {
        if (window.__karma__.files.hasOwnProperty(file)) {
            if (/Spec\.js$/.test(file)) {
                tests.push(file.replace(/^\/base\//,
                 'http://localhost:9876/base/'));
            }
        }
    }

    requirejs.config({
        // Karma serves files from '/base'
        baseUrl: 'http://localhost:9876/base/src/',

        // ask Require.js to load these files (all our tests)
        deps: tests,

        // start test run, once Require.js is done
        callback: window.__karma__.start
    });
}());
At first we pass through each file listed in the configuration by using window.__karma__.files list and initiate spec files list. While doing so, we adjust the domain of the specs modules to one used by Karma - localhost:9876. It will also be used as a baseUrl attribute in Require.js configuration. Then we integrate Require.js and Karma together by passing Karma's stating method, window.__karma__.start, as a callback in line 21. The heart of the fusing appears in line 18, where we configure to load our specs prior to calling the callback. Once specs are loaded, callback will be invoked starting the testing.

Writing Grunt tasks


As promised, it's time to integrate all parts using Grunt.js. For this to happen, we'll require four packages: grunt, grunt-cli and grunt-karma, grunt-jasmine-node. The first two for running the tasks and the rest are for calling Karma and Node.js runners. Make sure to install the packages locally into project's folder, otherwise it will not work. In fact all the packages should be installed locally, when you work with Grunt.js.

Installing them can be done easily using package.json and bower.json files. Once the files are in place just call appropriate install commands. It will download all the packages automatically into project's folder.
npm install
bower install
If you an eager environmentalist like me, who doesn't wish to store anything, but essential data on your repository, you may use .gitignore file, which tells Git to ignore specified paths.
node_modules/
bower_components/
Grunt tasks are defined using JavaScript code in gruntfile.js.
(function () {
    'use strict';
    module.exports = function(grunt) {
        grunt.initConfig({
            pkg: grunt.file.readJSON('package.json'),
            karma: {
                unit_global: {
                    configFile: 'karma.conf.js'
                },

                unit_requirejs: {
                    configFile: 'karma.conf.require.js'
                }
            },
            jasmine_node: {
                options: {
                    forceExit: true,
                    match: '.',
                    matchall: false,
                    extensions: 'js',
                    specNameMatcher: 'spec'
                },
                all: ['test/spec/']
            }
        });

        grunt.loadNpmTasks('grunt-karma');
        grunt.loadNpmTasks('grunt-jasmine-node');
        grunt.registerTask('default', ['jasmine_node', 
            'karma:unit_global', 'karma:unit_requirejs']);
    };
}());
Not very intimidating, isn't it? Basically what it does is configures our test tasks, loads the required packages and then runs the tasks. Now in details. At first it configures our Karma tasks by specifying two children in karma node: unit_global and unit_requirejs, each states it's configuration file name. Then it configures Node.js runner. Since it doesn't have any configuration file, all the settings are listed here. In the end, it runs the tasks in the order they appear in parameter array of registerTask method. Notice the usage of semicolon, when Karma tasks are specified. It tells Grunt to run specific tasks under karma node.

Tasks names can be changed, both jasmine_node and karma node's names cannot.


Aren't you eager to see the results?
grunt
Grunt will load and run the gruntfile.js file emitting the following result:
Running "jasmine_node:all" (jasmine_node) task
Common
    Vector
        check length
        check toArray
Mappers
    PlaneMapper
        check mapping
Finished in 0.014 seconds
3 tests, 3 assertions, 0 failures

Running "karma:unit_global" (karma) task
INFO [karma]: Karma v0.12.23 server started at http://localhost:9876/
INFO [launcher]: Starting browser Chrome
INFO [launcher]: Starting browser Firefox
INFO [Chrome 36.0.1985]: Connected on socket HrOcIkaJ5aqQG85SOqIS
with id 63263274
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.032 secs / 0.005 secs)
INFO [Firefox 31.0.0]: Connected on socket wrrkgK5_skzDJztmOqIT wi
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.032 secs / 0.005 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.032 secs / 0.005 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.032 secs / 0.005 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.032 secs / 0.005 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.032 secs / 0.005 secs)
Firefox 31.0.0: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.026 secs / 0.002 secs)
TOTAL: 6 SUCCESS

Running "karma:unit_requirejs" (karma) task
INFO [karma]: Karma v0.12.23 server started at http://localhost:9876/
INFO [launcher]: Starting browser Chrome
INFO [launcher]: Starting browser Firefox
INFO [Chrome 36.0.1985]: Connected on socket PXxh9c5vacKQovhSOsI2
with id 36823086
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.004 secs / 0.002 secs)
INFO [Firefox 31.0.0]: Connected on socket Xu3qldD3wfmNskyOOsI3 wi
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.004 secs / 0.002 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.004 secs / 0.002 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.004 secs / 0.002 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.004 secs / 0.002 secs
Chrome 36.0.1985: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.004 secs / 0.002 secs)
Firefox 31.0.0: Executed 3 of 3 SUCCESS (0.005 secs / 0.002 secs)
TOTAL: 6 SUCCESS

Done, without errors.
Perfection! But it's only a tip of the iceberg. We'll be talking more about Grunt.js using conditional logic and reporting, so stay tuned ;)